For instance, similar comparisons apply for score, Wald, and exact confidence intervals for a Poisson parameter µ, based on an observation X from that distribution. Results similar to those in this article also hold in other discrete problems. In particular, even though the score and adjusted Wald intervals leave something to be desired in terms of satisfying the usual technical definition of “95% confidence”, the operational performance of those methods is better than the exact interval in terms of how most practitioners interpret that term. The score and adjusted Wald confidence intervals for p provide shorter intervals with actual coverage probability usuallyu nearer the nominal confidence level. In forming a 95% confidence interval, is it better to use an approach that guarantees that the actual coverage probabilities are at least 0,95 yet typically achieves coverage probabilities of about 0,98 or 0,99, or an approach giving narrower intervals for which the actual coverage probability could be less than 0,95 but is usually quite close to 0,95? For most applications, we would prefer the latter.

The score and adjusted Wald intervals can have coverage probabilities lower than the nominal confidence level, yet the typical coverage probability is close to that level. The Clopper-Pearson interval has coverage probabilities bounded below by the nominal confidence level, but the typical coverage probability is much higher than that level. Tech/Engineering - Mathematics & Statistics / coverage probabilitiesĮnglish term or phrase: endpoints of the exact interval Ele possibilita a deteco de diferenas de intervalo de tempo. Social Science, Sociology, Ethics, etc.Įndpoints of the exact interval Portuguese translation: extremidade do intervalo exato entre 35 dB e 60 dB, na testagem da audiometria em campo aberto com implante coclear e.General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters.Mathematics & Statistics Change Discipline

Intervalo aberto e fechado